In this article we delve into the features of the Rolex Submariner replica. We will also show you a review made on the comparison of this model between 4 different factories that will surely help you to better understand which factory to choose. We will then point you to the best websites to buy this rolex replica model.
Introduced in 1953, the Rolex Submariner was the first waterproof watch capable of withstanding depths of up to 100 meters (330 feet). Designed to cater to the needs of professional divers, the Submariner quickly gained recognition as a pioneering tool watch. Its innovative features, such as the rotatable bezel with minute markers for tracking dive times, made it a favorite among divers and adventurers alike.
The Rolex Submariner is an iconic timepiece that has captured the hearts of watch enthusiasts for generations. Its unparalleled design, precision engineering, and robust functionality have made it one of the most coveted luxury watches in the world.
Who makes the best Rolex Submariner?
- VSF (116610 and 126610)
- Clean (116610 and 126610)
- ZF (116610 and 126610)
If you want to know more about which are the best factories for each replica watch model read here.
Rolex Submariner Review: "Review of ZZF New Sub 116610 LN and Comparison vs. Gen, ARF, Noob and Nail "
Insert Markers Close View
ZZF says that it is the only rep factory using real platinum plated on the insert markers at the moment. From the factory explanation, we know that the adhesive force of platinum is extremely strong after the plating procedure, which means that it will be very hard to deal with the details shaping after the platinum plating.
This might be the reason why other factories didn’t make platinum plating on their insert markers.
Because of using real platinum plating, ZZF insert markers color is like gen effect, grey-white by the front view and dark-silver by the lateral view. But to be honest, its color is really some darker than the gen.
But under the natural daylight, ZZF insert markers color will have a better performance.
ARF insert markers color is also good I suppose, only a little bit whiter than the gen. The plating seems a little bit rougher than the gen and ZZF.
Noob and Nail versions are both not very good at this part, and according to former experiences Noob color is going to fade eventually, don’t know how Nail is going yet.
Shape of the Insert Markers
ZZF says that it is using a mould to build the ceramic insert directly instead of laser engraving markers on insert, then 3D effect will be much better than laser engraving as a result. The bottom and side edge of the marker is very smooth and it is a perfect right-angle between the bottom and side edge, closer effect to the gen as well as the depth.
ARF is also using a mould to build the ceramic, shape and depth are also close to the gen as well as ZZF, not bad but just a little bit rougher.
Noob and Nail, are both using laser engraving markers.
Pearl Triangle Close View
ZZF pearl is very close to the gen at its shape, color and “jade-like” effect and it is fitted in a 0.43mm small hole on the ceramic insert, will be the only one can replace perfectly with a gen pearl.
ARF pearl is also a very good built at its shape and color as well as ZZF pearl.
Noob pearl seems not very good.
Nail pearl is likely good at its shape, but the color is bit whiter than others.
And about the triangle, the triangle is very near the insert edge on the gen.
But seems all the factories made the same mistake, only Nail did it a little bit better on this part.
Tips: ZZF is using Clean Factory upgraded V2 bezel and inset set, all friction fitted as same as gen. ARF bezel and insert set is friction fitted as well and Noob version is glue fitted.
Crystal Side View
ZZF crystal assembly is very good I suppose, very close to the gen with a rounded edge from the side view,
ARF crystal assembly might be worst one among all the 5 watches, the crystal seems too thick so that too much higher than others.
Noob crystal assembly is good as well, but only a little bit thicker and higher.
Nail crystal assembly is very good as well as ZZF, also very close to the gen.
Cyclops Lateral View
ZZF says that it is using the new tech to plate very light blue AR coating around the edge of the bubble crystal as same as genuine, as a result so there will not be too much light reflection cause unclear seeing the date as other factories versions. And the side of the bubble crystal is dealt with sanding tech in order to create a little frosted effect closer to the genuine.
Cyclops Front View
ZZF bubble crystal is very clear with less light reflection and we can see a thin “white line” around the edge of the bubble as well because of the sanding tech.
ARF bubble crystal seems be with more light reflection, and as many people said its date wheel font seems too fat.
Noob bubble crystal has the same issue as ARF I suppose, with a thinner font.
Nail did a good job on this part. It is very clear and reflection is good as well as the whole effect.
Dial Cambered Edge
The center hole and date window on ZZF dial are built with cambered edge very close to the genuine, and it will be the only one doing it at the moment.
Date Display Window Lateral View
ZZF window edge is cambered very close to the gen, and making a cambered edge on an enamel dial is extremely hard.
ARF window edge is also cambered close to the gen, and this is a good job as well.
Noob and Nail are both wrong at this detail with a sharp trapezoid window edge.
Dial Marker Close View
ZZF triangle marker, rectangle marker and dot marker are all with rounded edge.
ARF triangle marker and dot marker are with rounded edge, but the rectangle marker rounded edge is not very obvious and seems a bit sharp.
Noob all markers are with sharp edge, seems not very good.
Nail triangle marker, rectangle marker and dot marker are all with rounded edge, but it seems that rectangle and dot markers are not very obviously rounded.
I suppose ARF is the best one at dot markers, and ZZF is the best one at triangle marker and rectangle markers.
Superlume Filling Front View
ZZF says that it is using the same blue color Luminova material which is well-proportioned filling as the gen, and the granular effect of Luminova material is stronger than other swiss lume materials. There is very small 0.15mm height between the lume material and the top edge of the marker, and it is also very hard to do.
It looks like that there is a little transparent effect when you look close enough at the genuine lume material, and I think all the factories did this effect right except Noob. But I suppose ZZF is the best one regarding to the granular effect.
Dial Font Printing View
The font printing on the gen dial is different between the first line “SUBMARINER” and the second to forth line.
I suppose ZZF is the best one at this part with obvious different fonts. ARF is not right as well as Noob, and I think Noob V7 did such different fonts for a while but now all gone if I remember it right.
Nail did a closer trial but the font on second to forth line is too thin as we can see, especially “1000ft = 300m” part.
Hand Stack Close View
ZZF is obviously the only factory making a solid hand hole at the moment.
SEL and Lug Close View
ZZF made the lug radian and SEL radian to be the same, and also a small height between lug and SEL. But the height between lug and SEL on ZZF is obviously smaller than the gen.
ARF also made a height between lug and SEL, but it is a little bit bigger than gen. And the lug radian and SEL radian is not same as we can see from the picture.
Noob is obviously wrong again at this part, barely no height.
Nail did a good job on this part, small height between lug and SEL close to the gen, only problem is that radian is likely not same.
Definition of Front Glass
All 4 factories are pretty much the same, only a very tiny slight difference among each other.
ZZF and Nail might be a very little bit better.
And according to ZZF explained, its front sapphire is using double sided AR coating make the crystal clearer. As single sided AR coating can increase 25% more definition and double sided AR coating can increase 50% more definition.
Thickness of Front Glass
All 4 factories did almost a same job on this.
As ZZF said, the genuine glass thickness is exact 2.0mm and it’s usual that there is small thicker difference within 0.05mm when producing a rep sapphire. And the thickness of the sapphire may affect the cyclops halo effect.
Laser Crown at 6 Position
None of these 4 factories did a good job on this, compare with genuine.
And it seems that ARF looks even better than genuine as it has a very clear “Crown” shape there.
Rehaut Close View
The rehaut engraving on the new ZZF sub is not aligned well, especially at the 6 position it’s very obvious.
And about the building tech, ZZF, ARF and Nail are all using laser to make the engraving. Noob is the only one using corrosion tech to make the engraving even though it is good at the looking appearance.
Ceramic Insert View
The genuine, ZZF and ARF are friction fitted, Noob and Nail are using glue fitted.
Steel Bezel View
ZZF is using Clean Factory V2 bezel set and the fitting method is same like the genuine.
About the bezel teeth, Noob teeth is too small and is the only one seems too far different from the gen.
Bezel Assembly
ARF and Noob are using a rounded tiny screw on the holding spring, and Nail’s little screw is not even very rounded.
ZZF is the only one using a tiny ball on the spring, so the feeling of turning bezel will be the closest to genuine even though there is still little different feeling I felt personally there.
Bracelet and Clasp View
We have tried ARF bracelet and ZZF bracelet to fit on the gen case, both can fit on well.
Noob and Nail are using the same bracelet factory or supplier, as we can see the same “ST9” code and almost the same details, but it’s only a guessing though.
After a careful comparison, I think ARF makes the best rep bracelet among these 4 rep watches.
ZZF Pearl Structure
From Clean Factory told, it is very hard to make that on a tiny pearl sapphire and it will give the pearl a more 3D effect. The Luminova material is filled into this tiny curved space on the back side of the pearl sapphire instead, which requires very experienced tech as well. And because the pearl is also friction fitted on the pedestal, they said they will need to make sure that there is a very tiny gap like 0.05mm between the Luminova material and the edge of the sapphire, in case of breaking the Luminova when press the pearl on its pedestal. And as it is friction fitted without any glue, so this structure avoid the chemical reaction between Luminova and glue, in other words the color of the pearl can stay the same for a long time.
Dial Front View
ZZF dial is the only one has the rounded effect both on center hole and date window edge.
This guide was made by Jtime, one of the trusted sellers.
The site was closed down some time ago, but the seller is back with a new domain. You can visit the site at this link.
Best website for Rolex Submariner Replica Watch?
If you aspire to own a Rolex Submariner, it is essential to choose well and invest in a piece from a reputable and reliable dealer. By doing so, you will not only ensure the quality of your purchase, but also experience the pride and joy of owning a timeless masterpiece. Here are what is generally agreed to be the two best websites for rolex submariner:
Be First to Comment